Runners are an opinionated bunch. I know because I am a runner, and I am opinionated.
When we as runners chose running over other exercises each of us had our reasons. For one thing, it’s pretty economical. Shoes are the main expense and most can get themselves on the road with an outlay of under $100. Although running itself is not so easy, getting there certainly is, as long as you don’t mind running on pavement. Just suit up, go out the door, stretch for a few minutes and run. Assuming you have no skeletal or muscular injuries and are not prone to such, running is one of the most effective ways to get a very good cardiovascular workout.
Of course we as runners more than likely considered some other exercise disciplines, primarily biking and swimming. Now isn’t that interesting? They are the other two-thirds of the triathlon! So why didn’t we start out with a mix of the three, or maybe a focus upon biking or swimming? Putting aside for a moment the economics of the decision many, like me, passed on the other disciplines because we read or heard that although they are great exercise they are nevertheless less workout than running. The argument goes something like this: the better you get at swimming, the less workout you will achieve. Efficiency comes at a price, and that same argument can be applied to biking. You often hear that an hour of biking is NOT the same workout as an hour of running, and that’s quite possibly so. I’m no authority on this, just opinionated.
So if we’re so darned sure of the superiority of running, why do we shake in our boots when we decide to (tri)athlon? Well, for one thing, the boots will definitely sink us when we try to swim in them. But aside from that, we are insecure about learning a new skill, especially swimming. And a few sessions in the pool certainly convinced me that this was some hard work ahead. Truth is, we runners who are just taking to the water have a long way to go before we become so efficient in our swimming that we minimize our one hour workout. In fact, until I got some recent feedback from a couple of efficient swimmers, I had about concluded that the running world’s snobbery about running being better exercise than swimming was contrived. But this weekend I spoke to a friend who swims but doesn’t run who opined that she gets less benefit as she gets more efficient in the water. Hmm. Then I got an email from Zetta Young, a strong and efficient swimmer.
Zetta wrote: “It is so much harder for [the beginner] and personally it p***es me off because they burn more calories than I do and swim less!”
So…..I guess we runners, in our opinionated way, have got it right about swimming being a lighter workout. Problem is, we have months, if not years, of drills and laps to swim before we begin sliding onto the downside of the curve. I have to say, my hat is off to the swimmers (and the cyclists). The embarrassing truth is that they could probably beat me at my game of running long before I will keep pace with them at their sports.
Read More......